I'll hold roughly 500 websites hosting on a server in the organization, is cellulose optic my singular choice for the nouns?
Is a co-location plans provided by those information centre a better choice?
Any answer would be appreciated.
Answers:
The problem is not near nouns, u could use simply GB port. The problems are beside redundacy: UPS, Internet connections, guarantee hardware (at 500 sites it's impossible to not be attacked). If u multiply adjectives this for sure u would prefer a datacenter colocation near built-in reduncancy and exchange cards bounds financial guarantee.
For this copious sites, you really call for multiple servers for redundancy, and will want far more upload bandwidth than any standard broadband can provide.
From a make friends perspective, you don't necessarily hold to use fiber for your environment of transport. It could effortlessly be copper if the bandwidth meet the requirement. Gauge how much bandwidth your servers would require and base on that, you can start looking for access/connectivity technology mortal offered by ISPs that would best suit your wants within the most cost-efficient comportment.